<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Raid Warning&#187; Raid Warning &#8211; A World of Warcraft Podcast</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.raidwarning.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.raidwarning.net</link>
	<description>Home of the Podcast about World of Warcraft</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 21:03:34 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Raid Warning Episode #34 &#8211; Plushies Are Evil by Zusterke</title>
		<link>http://www.raidwarning.net/2010/03/raid-warning-episode-34-plushies-are-evil/comment-page-1/#comment-556</link>
		<dc:creator>Zusterke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 21:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raidwarning.net/?p=3602#comment-556</guid>
		<description>Sorry for rambling on and on about this, but I thought of another reason this seems to be &#039;part of the master plan&#039;. As they brought down the spell costs to a rank-independent % of your base mana, you could end up paying more and more for your spells with each level. On top of that your baseregen lowers as well so you &#039;lose&#039; regen. The only way to compensate is increasing your stats which only new gear or BoA gear can provide.

I would be in favor of this change myself, despite the valid concerns outed during the show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for rambling on and on about this, but I thought of another reason this seems to be &#8216;part of the master plan&#8217;. As they brought down the spell costs to a rank-independent % of your base mana, you could end up paying more and more for your spells with each level. On top of that your baseregen lowers as well so you &#8216;lose&#8217; regen. The only way to compensate is increasing your stats which only new gear or BoA gear can provide.</p>
<p>I would be in favor of this change myself, despite the valid concerns outed during the show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Raid Warning Episode #34 &#8211; Plushies Are Evil by Zusterke</title>
		<link>http://www.raidwarning.net/2010/03/raid-warning-episode-34-plushies-are-evil/comment-page-1/#comment-554</link>
		<dc:creator>Zusterke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 14:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raidwarning.net/?p=3602#comment-554</guid>
		<description>The removal of spell ranks doesn&#039;t seem so odd to me (nor a bad idea).

Priests, for example, have spells such as &#039;lesser heal&#039; and &#039;heal&#039; which are abandoned down the leveling path as they are replaced by flash heal and greater heal. While both are &#039;okay&#039; spells this change could reintroduce lesser heal and heal which could cover up for our lack of downranking. While I wouldn&#039;t blame it entirely on our lack of downranking, the removal of this mechanic is one of the major reasons holy priests lost so much ground as tankhealers.

Furthermore, while leveling, the whole rank-thing reveals oddities. For example some spells are our &quot;less efficient but faster heal&quot; (ie: flash heal). However the new rank of FHeal you just learned after a ding could outperform the &#039;slow but powerfull and effective&#039; (Greater) Heal. Looking at the different ranks of the spells, they all seem to scale in a more or less comparable way and it is only these jumps in performance as a result from the ranks that gives some less intuitive intermediate behavior.
By making them scale with each level they eliminate this odd behavior which should yield a more intuitive learning system while leveling. Your experience with spell X at lvl 40 is probably going to help you still at lvl 80.
Also, it removes the concept of ranks which could simplify some stuff. No downranking penalty, no &#039;rank feature&#039;, no rank bug on dual specs. From personal experience by writing my own spell performance calculator, the rank concept really makes it a lot more complex. Removing this could actually factor out a lot of code that could ease the maintenance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The removal of spell ranks doesn&#8217;t seem so odd to me (nor a bad idea).</p>
<p>Priests, for example, have spells such as &#8216;lesser heal&#8217; and &#8216;heal&#8217; which are abandoned down the leveling path as they are replaced by flash heal and greater heal. While both are &#8216;okay&#8217; spells this change could reintroduce lesser heal and heal which could cover up for our lack of downranking. While I wouldn&#8217;t blame it entirely on our lack of downranking, the removal of this mechanic is one of the major reasons holy priests lost so much ground as tankhealers.</p>
<p>Furthermore, while leveling, the whole rank-thing reveals oddities. For example some spells are our &#8220;less efficient but faster heal&#8221; (ie: flash heal). However the new rank of FHeal you just learned after a ding could outperform the &#8217;slow but powerfull and effective&#8217; (Greater) Heal. Looking at the different ranks of the spells, they all seem to scale in a more or less comparable way and it is only these jumps in performance as a result from the ranks that gives some less intuitive intermediate behavior.<br />
By making them scale with each level they eliminate this odd behavior which should yield a more intuitive learning system while leveling. Your experience with spell X at lvl 40 is probably going to help you still at lvl 80.<br />
Also, it removes the concept of ranks which could simplify some stuff. No downranking penalty, no &#8216;rank feature&#8217;, no rank bug on dual specs. From personal experience by writing my own spell performance calculator, the rank concept really makes it a lot more complex. Removing this could actually factor out a lot of code that could ease the maintenance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Power Word: Fail &#8211; The Priest Roundtable Event by OMG.. Priest! &#187; Blog Archive &#187; DanityKane: Working It Out</title>
		<link>http://www.raidwarning.net/2010/03/power-word-fail-the-priest-roundtable-event/comment-page-1/#comment-552</link>
		<dc:creator>OMG.. Priest! &#187; Blog Archive &#187; DanityKane: Working It Out</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 05:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raidwarning.net/?p=3589#comment-552</guid>
		<description>[...] That&#8217;s just so sad to me.  Oh well.. I will keep trying.  I have been listening to the Power Word: Fail podcast- the holy and the discipline section- trying to get more tips.  I am going to keep working on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] That&#8217;s just so sad to me.  Oh well.. I will keep trying.  I have been listening to the Power Word: Fail podcast- the holy and the discipline section- trying to get more tips.  I am going to keep working on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Power Word: Fail &#8211; The Priest Roundtable by Upcoming Priest-Related Podcast &#124; Divine Aegis</title>
		<link>http://www.raidwarning.net/priests/comment-page-1/#comment-548</link>
		<dc:creator>Upcoming Priest-Related Podcast &#124; Divine Aegis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 19:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raidwarning.net/?page_id=3368#comment-548</guid>
		<description>[...] [Putricide-voice] Good news, everyone! [/Putricide-voice] I&#8217;m pleased to announce that I&#8217;ll be a guest on the Raid!Warning podcast on March 1st for the Priest Roundtable lovingly titled Power Word: Fail. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [Putricide-voice] Good news, everyone! [/Putricide-voice] I&#8217;m pleased to announce that I&#8217;ll be a guest on the Raid!Warning podcast on March 1st for the Priest Roundtable lovingly titled Power Word: Fail. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Power Word: Fail &#8211; The Priest Roundtable Event by Lilitharien</title>
		<link>http://www.raidwarning.net/2010/03/power-word-fail-the-priest-roundtable-event/comment-page-1/#comment-547</link>
		<dc:creator>Lilitharien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 19:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raidwarning.net/?p=3589#comment-547</guid>
		<description>I like this idea! We could run with with it, maybe....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this idea! We could run with with it, maybe&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Power Word: Fail &#8211; The Priest Roundtable Event by Seven</title>
		<link>http://www.raidwarning.net/2010/03/power-word-fail-the-priest-roundtable-event/comment-page-1/#comment-546</link>
		<dc:creator>Seven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 18:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raidwarning.net/?p=3589#comment-546</guid>
		<description>It really depends on how much of a community there is for each class. We&#039;re by no means experts (which is why we don&#039;t make the round tables about us, or talk much for that matter), so we try to gather as many people who know and talk about the class as we can and build a show around them.

The hunters and priests shows just came together from people we&#039;ve heard of in the community and their input.  By all means, if there&#039;s enough support for a class we&#039;ll create one. We just don&#039;t want to make a &quot;round table&quot; that&#039;s just us and a few uninformed guildies. It doesn&#039;t benefit anyone really.

So yeah, if there&#039;s one you&#039;d like to see made, forward suggestions to RAIDWARNINGPODCAST@GMAIL.COM and let us know the class and maybe a few key members of the community we can contact.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It really depends on how much of a community there is for each class. We&#8217;re by no means experts (which is why we don&#8217;t make the round tables about us, or talk much for that matter), so we try to gather as many people who know and talk about the class as we can and build a show around them.</p>
<p>The hunters and priests shows just came together from people we&#8217;ve heard of in the community and their input.  By all means, if there&#8217;s enough support for a class we&#8217;ll create one. We just don&#8217;t want to make a &#8220;round table&#8221; that&#8217;s just us and a few uninformed guildies. It doesn&#8217;t benefit anyone really.</p>
<p>So yeah, if there&#8217;s one you&#8217;d like to see made, forward suggestions to <a href="mailto:RAIDWARNINGPODCAST@GMAIL.COM">RAIDWARNINGPODCAST@GMAIL.COM</a> and let us know the class and maybe a few key members of the community we can contact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Power Word: Fail &#8211; The Priest Roundtable Event by Forresst</title>
		<link>http://www.raidwarning.net/2010/03/power-word-fail-the-priest-roundtable-event/comment-page-1/#comment-545</link>
		<dc:creator>Forresst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 17:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raidwarning.net/?p=3589#comment-545</guid>
		<description>Are you planning to do a round table event for each class?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you planning to do a round table event for each class?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Power Word: Fail &#8211; The Priest Roundtable Event by Fhi</title>
		<link>http://www.raidwarning.net/2010/03/power-word-fail-the-priest-roundtable-event/comment-page-1/#comment-542</link>
		<dc:creator>Fhi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 03:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raidwarning.net/?p=3589#comment-542</guid>
		<description>Shadow guide was definitely lacking, I heard spriests in a podcast!!! and now that I listened I&#039;m a little disappointed. The issues talked about were definitely not anything a very experienced spriest would even get anything out of, especially if they keep on top of theory crafting but I would have to agree with their expectations for Cat as far as our talent tree goes.

F*** MAGES!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shadow guide was definitely lacking, I heard spriests in a podcast!!! and now that I listened I&#8217;m a little disappointed. The issues talked about were definitely not anything a very experienced spriest would even get anything out of, especially if they keep on top of theory crafting but I would have to agree with their expectations for Cat as far as our talent tree goes.</p>
<p>F*** MAGES!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Power Word: Fail &#8211; The Priest Roundtable Event by Zusterke</title>
		<link>http://www.raidwarning.net/2010/03/power-word-fail-the-priest-roundtable-event/comment-page-1/#comment-541</link>
		<dc:creator>Zusterke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 19:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raidwarning.net/?p=3589#comment-541</guid>
		<description>Actually no, I don&#039;t think 8000 SP and 0 crit and haste would beat any other combination. But I do get your point and I fear we&#039;d trail into a pointless debate if I keep hammering on it ;)

I really think it&#039;s too bad you are disappointed on the Shadow part. I enjoyed the part and I feel I learned from it. But I&#039;ll admit that is &#039;coming from a healer&#039; as Shadow was little more than vacation trip for me.  I don&#039;t think the podcast was detaied in exact math terms per se, but that is hardly the goal of a podcast IMO. If I need the exact numbers, I can go to EJ or Shadowpriest.com, knowing both were mentioned. Podcasts are capable of letting people speak and get their vision across far better than a blogpost can but it does risk trailing into a debate that may be considered &#039;less crucial&#039; to the listeners. 
I&#039;m very pleased that Raidwarning has asked them questions regarding their view on things because it is, perhaps, the single one thing I find hard to obtain on the net. Numbers are far easier to get across on a post than such things and to have this open discussion from such a cast... just wow!

Ah well! I&#039;ll just sip another beer and listen to it again when drunk. Knowing this crew, I&#039;m bound to find deeper meanings and messages sent to the drunken mind. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually no, I don&#8217;t think 8000 SP and 0 crit and haste would beat any other combination. But I do get your point and I fear we&#8217;d trail into a pointless debate if I keep hammering on it <img src='http://raidwarning.net/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I really think it&#8217;s too bad you are disappointed on the Shadow part. I enjoyed the part and I feel I learned from it. But I&#8217;ll admit that is &#8216;coming from a healer&#8217; as Shadow was little more than vacation trip for me.  I don&#8217;t think the podcast was detaied in exact math terms per se, but that is hardly the goal of a podcast IMO. If I need the exact numbers, I can go to EJ or Shadowpriest.com, knowing both were mentioned. Podcasts are capable of letting people speak and get their vision across far better than a blogpost can but it does risk trailing into a debate that may be considered &#8216;less crucial&#8217; to the listeners.<br />
I&#8217;m very pleased that Raidwarning has asked them questions regarding their view on things because it is, perhaps, the single one thing I find hard to obtain on the net. Numbers are far easier to get across on a post than such things and to have this open discussion from such a cast&#8230; just wow!</p>
<p>Ah well! I&#8217;ll just sip another beer and listen to it again when drunk. Knowing this crew, I&#8217;m bound to find deeper meanings and messages sent to the drunken mind. <img src='http://raidwarning.net/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Power Word: Fail &#8211; The Priest Roundtable Event by Sokario</title>
		<link>http://www.raidwarning.net/2010/03/power-word-fail-the-priest-roundtable-event/comment-page-1/#comment-540</link>
		<dc:creator>Sokario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 18:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raidwarning.net/?p=3589#comment-540</guid>
		<description>I made the comment after I had listened to the rest of the podcast and exact details had faded. After re-listening to that one spot again, the speaker does mention haste is near equal to spellpower, but as a whole the answer focuses far too much on crit. It&#039;s a strange, strange situation if -- again given equal ilevel -- anyone could ever use crit more than haste in game. 

You can make a theoretical argument too where having 8000 spellpower and 0 crit and haste would be better, but it&#039;d never happen in game; and since everyone has easy access to 245+ gear now, pretty much everyone will have a decent balance. The talk of &quot;haste cap,&quot; which would never happen on a spriest (during bloodlust and other haste buffs that&#039;d cap Mind Blast you go to pure Mind Flay), and the talk of latency, really have no place in the discussion.  The &quot;sliding scale&quot; will never tip in the direction of crit with any &quot;real&quot; gear set. It&#039;s overcomplicating things and planting weird ideas in the heads of the kind of newbie shadow priest who might benefit from listening to the podcast.

As a side note on my second listen, the talk of Mind Sear being a &quot;trash padder&quot; is nonsense. It&#039;s an absolutely amazing tool for a number of bosses.  Glyph of Dispersion gets a little lip service but the spell itself is disparaged multiple times in the podcast when the fact is skilled usage of it on bosses like Festergut, Sindrigosa, and Lich King can lead to sizable DPS increases, to say nothing of the additional defensive allotments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I made the comment after I had listened to the rest of the podcast and exact details had faded. After re-listening to that one spot again, the speaker does mention haste is near equal to spellpower, but as a whole the answer focuses far too much on crit. It&#8217;s a strange, strange situation if &#8212; again given equal ilevel &#8212; anyone could ever use crit more than haste in game. </p>
<p>You can make a theoretical argument too where having 8000 spellpower and 0 crit and haste would be better, but it&#8217;d never happen in game; and since everyone has easy access to 245+ gear now, pretty much everyone will have a decent balance. The talk of &#8220;haste cap,&#8221; which would never happen on a spriest (during bloodlust and other haste buffs that&#8217;d cap Mind Blast you go to pure Mind Flay), and the talk of latency, really have no place in the discussion.  The &#8220;sliding scale&#8221; will never tip in the direction of crit with any &#8220;real&#8221; gear set. It&#8217;s overcomplicating things and planting weird ideas in the heads of the kind of newbie shadow priest who might benefit from listening to the podcast.</p>
<p>As a side note on my second listen, the talk of Mind Sear being a &#8220;trash padder&#8221; is nonsense. It&#8217;s an absolutely amazing tool for a number of bosses.  Glyph of Dispersion gets a little lip service but the spell itself is disparaged multiple times in the podcast when the fact is skilled usage of it on bosses like Festergut, Sindrigosa, and Lich King can lead to sizable DPS increases, to say nothing of the additional defensive allotments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Power Word: Fail &#8211; The Priest Roundtable Event by Zusterke</title>
		<link>http://www.raidwarning.net/2010/03/power-word-fail-the-priest-roundtable-event/comment-page-1/#comment-539</link>
		<dc:creator>Zusterke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raidwarning.net/?p=3589#comment-539</guid>
		<description>Alright. I think we are looking at the same model but from a different side. Given 0 crit and 0 haste and the choice to distribute 4000 rating as you wish, you would probably be best investing in both crit and haste even if you&#039;d take, say 2600 hasterating and only 1400 crit. Is haste &#039;better&#039;? It is in the sense that you&#039;d want more haste than crit but it is not unconditionally better. Now, your gear choices may limit the options, obviously... and this is where your point is likely true: with the gear choices available, you&#039;ll probably want to gem haste or go for haste on the odd spirit item. That&#039;s a good conclusion, but it is important to note the starting situation. Imagine a holy priest focusing on haste (which isn&#039;t unheard of) then it wouldn&#039;t be odd if he should focus on crit more on his +spirit+haste gear at the start untill he gets the necessay +haste+crit items.

If I check the crew&#039;s answer on that question at 7:20 - &quot;General numbers from Shadowpriest.com and EJ read that Spellpower pretty much equals Haste although it slightly depends on how much haste and spellpower you have, so it&#039;s very possible that is has more benefits than crit&quot;. Then I can&#039;t help feeling it&#039;s in line with your numbers: &quot;derived from Simcraft, currently approximate crit as worth .88 spellpower and haste as about .98 spellpower per point of rating&quot;

What part am I missing? I&#039;m no pro on Shadow so if I&#039;m not seeing it.. it&#039;s probably because I&#039;m missing something (apart from common sense, but that&#039;s off topic ;) ). You seem to know this stuff quite well!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alright. I think we are looking at the same model but from a different side. Given 0 crit and 0 haste and the choice to distribute 4000 rating as you wish, you would probably be best investing in both crit and haste even if you&#8217;d take, say 2600 hasterating and only 1400 crit. Is haste &#8216;better&#8217;? It is in the sense that you&#8217;d want more haste than crit but it is not unconditionally better. Now, your gear choices may limit the options, obviously&#8230; and this is where your point is likely true: with the gear choices available, you&#8217;ll probably want to gem haste or go for haste on the odd spirit item. That&#8217;s a good conclusion, but it is important to note the starting situation. Imagine a holy priest focusing on haste (which isn&#8217;t unheard of) then it wouldn&#8217;t be odd if he should focus on crit more on his +spirit+haste gear at the start untill he gets the necessay +haste+crit items.</p>
<p>If I check the crew&#8217;s answer on that question at 7:20 &#8211; &#8220;General numbers from Shadowpriest.com and EJ read that Spellpower pretty much equals Haste although it slightly depends on how much haste and spellpower you have, so it&#8217;s very possible that is has more benefits than crit&#8221;. Then I can&#8217;t help feeling it&#8217;s in line with your numbers: &#8220;derived from Simcraft, currently approximate crit as worth .88 spellpower and haste as about .98 spellpower per point of rating&#8221;</p>
<p>What part am I missing? I&#8217;m no pro on Shadow so if I&#8217;m not seeing it.. it&#8217;s probably because I&#8217;m missing something (apart from common sense, but that&#8217;s off topic <img src='http://raidwarning.net/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  ). You seem to know this stuff quite well!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Power Word: Fail &#8211; The Priest Roundtable Event by New Priest T10 Bonus: Good or Bad? &#124; Divine Aegis</title>
		<link>http://www.raidwarning.net/2010/03/power-word-fail-the-priest-roundtable-event/comment-page-1/#comment-538</link>
		<dc:creator>New Priest T10 Bonus: Good or Bad? &#124; Divine Aegis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 15:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raidwarning.net/?p=3589#comment-538</guid>
		<description>[...] shield-spamming in raids lately than straight tank-healing. However, as Avalonna pointed out during the podcast, it&#8217;s a phenomenal bonus for tank [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] shield-spamming in raids lately than straight tank-healing. However, as Avalonna pointed out during the podcast, it&#8217;s a phenomenal bonus for tank [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Power Word: Fail &#8211; The Priest Roundtable Event by Sokario</title>
		<link>http://www.raidwarning.net/2010/03/power-word-fail-the-priest-roundtable-event/comment-page-1/#comment-537</link>
		<dc:creator>Sokario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 15:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raidwarning.net/?p=3589#comment-537</guid>
		<description>Having some balance of crit and haste is always preferable because DPS increasing stats feed off of each other; the more of one you have, the better the other is. However, in all but the most extreme cases, this effect can be safely ignored because you&#039;ll always have some balance of the two stats. In every single slot where it&#039;s available, given equal ilevel, you want the piece that gives both crit and haste, so you&#039;ll always have good amounts of both. The difference, then, comes when you pick between haste and crit on the odd spirit or hit piece you find, and for gemming yellow slots with ametrines.  

shadowpriest.com and elitistjerks.com&#039;s scaling factors, derived from Simcraft, currently approximate crit as worth .88 spellpower and haste as about .98 spellpower per point of rating for an &quot;average&quot; priest.  The most recent version of Simcraft shows for my priest, who is geared in majority 264 with a couple 277s and 251s, haste as .89 and crit at .78 spellpower.  You can of course upload your own profile in and get personalized numbers. The point is, on average, haste is approximately 10-15% better than crit, point for point, mathematically. Formulas are available if you wish to research them.

To cover your non-mathematical points: 
--Mind Blast has a reduced benefit from haste but that is factored into calculations. In addition, at high enough gear levels and with 4pt10, you drop Mind Blast from your rotation entirely. I no longer use it at all unless Replenishment is needed.  Shadow Word Pain is one of our lowest damage spells and so while it doesn&#039;t benefit from haste, it only has so much effect on the calculations.
--Haste does increase mana spent, but mana is very, very far from an issue for a shadow priest in almost every fight in the game; every priest should have Imp Spirit Tap and 3 minute shadowfiend which should be enough anyway, but then you can also spec Focused Mind if you still run low, and you can disperse on phase changes and other such forced DPS stop times.  If you&#039;re running oom as a spriest you&#039;re simply doing something wrong.
--Glyph of Shadow should always be active anyway because you still have plenty of crit on your gear. In addition, even with lower crit %, getting more spells off will affect Glyph of Shadow uptime anyway. It&#039;s a wash and not worth discussing.
--The effect of additional spellcasting, especially with 4pt10, and how it interacts with latency, player skill, etc is pretty much the only issue worth bringing up.  My argument is this: in an extreme situation of haste stacking compared to crit stacking, the difference in your cast times will range between .25 seconds to .5 seconds between all of your spells.  This isn&#039;t a huge change and shouldn&#039;t dramatically affect your innate skill, and I seriously doubt it ever would affect it enough to outweigh the mathematical superiority of haste.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having some balance of crit and haste is always preferable because DPS increasing stats feed off of each other; the more of one you have, the better the other is. However, in all but the most extreme cases, this effect can be safely ignored because you&#8217;ll always have some balance of the two stats. In every single slot where it&#8217;s available, given equal ilevel, you want the piece that gives both crit and haste, so you&#8217;ll always have good amounts of both. The difference, then, comes when you pick between haste and crit on the odd spirit or hit piece you find, and for gemming yellow slots with ametrines.  </p>
<p>shadowpriest.com and elitistjerks.com&#8217;s scaling factors, derived from Simcraft, currently approximate crit as worth .88 spellpower and haste as about .98 spellpower per point of rating for an &#8220;average&#8221; priest.  The most recent version of Simcraft shows for my priest, who is geared in majority 264 with a couple 277s and 251s, haste as .89 and crit at .78 spellpower.  You can of course upload your own profile in and get personalized numbers. The point is, on average, haste is approximately 10-15% better than crit, point for point, mathematically. Formulas are available if you wish to research them.</p>
<p>To cover your non-mathematical points:<br />
&#8211;Mind Blast has a reduced benefit from haste but that is factored into calculations. In addition, at high enough gear levels and with 4pt10, you drop Mind Blast from your rotation entirely. I no longer use it at all unless Replenishment is needed.  Shadow Word Pain is one of our lowest damage spells and so while it doesn&#8217;t benefit from haste, it only has so much effect on the calculations.<br />
&#8211;Haste does increase mana spent, but mana is very, very far from an issue for a shadow priest in almost every fight in the game; every priest should have Imp Spirit Tap and 3 minute shadowfiend which should be enough anyway, but then you can also spec Focused Mind if you still run low, and you can disperse on phase changes and other such forced DPS stop times.  If you&#8217;re running oom as a spriest you&#8217;re simply doing something wrong.<br />
&#8211;Glyph of Shadow should always be active anyway because you still have plenty of crit on your gear. In addition, even with lower crit %, getting more spells off will affect Glyph of Shadow uptime anyway. It&#8217;s a wash and not worth discussing.<br />
&#8211;The effect of additional spellcasting, especially with 4pt10, and how it interacts with latency, player skill, etc is pretty much the only issue worth bringing up.  My argument is this: in an extreme situation of haste stacking compared to crit stacking, the difference in your cast times will range between .25 seconds to .5 seconds between all of your spells.  This isn&#8217;t a huge change and shouldn&#8217;t dramatically affect your innate skill, and I seriously doubt it ever would affect it enough to outweigh the mathematical superiority of haste.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Power Word: Fail &#8211; The Priest Roundtable Event by Lerouse</title>
		<link>http://www.raidwarning.net/2010/03/power-word-fail-the-priest-roundtable-event/comment-page-1/#comment-536</link>
		<dc:creator>Lerouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 13:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raidwarning.net/?p=3589#comment-536</guid>
		<description>Really enjoyed listening to this despite not being a Priest good work guys!

I would really like to hear a Resto Shaman round table sometime if you guys plan on doing this again in the future :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really enjoyed listening to this despite not being a Priest good work guys!</p>
<p>I would really like to hear a Resto Shaman round table sometime if you guys plan on doing this again in the future <img src='http://raidwarning.net/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Power Word: Fail &#8211; The Priest Roundtable Event by Ari</title>
		<link>http://www.raidwarning.net/2010/03/power-word-fail-the-priest-roundtable-event/comment-page-1/#comment-535</link>
		<dc:creator>Ari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 11:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raidwarning.net/?p=3589#comment-535</guid>
		<description>I love this podcast, and I wish it was a regular thing. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love this podcast, and I wish it was a regular thing. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Power Word: Fail &#8211; The Priest Roundtable Event by Zusterke</title>
		<link>http://www.raidwarning.net/2010/03/power-word-fail-the-priest-roundtable-event/comment-page-1/#comment-534</link>
		<dc:creator>Zusterke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 10:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raidwarning.net/?p=3589#comment-534</guid>
		<description>I would be quite interested if you could give me a reference on the math indicating the benefit of haste over crit. I do a bit theorycrafting myself and I would love to see the works on it.

AFAIK SW:P does not benefit from Haste though the other DoT&#039;s do. Crit, however, has a 100% damage bonus to all spells that shadow uses. Now.. Haste is a strong throughput stat in mathematical terms because:
 - 1% Haste = 1% throughput, mathematically speaking
 - Haste requires less rating than crit.

However, such maths often neglect other factors:
 - Mind Blast has a cooldown and thus there is a reduced benefit of haste for that spell. 
 - Haste increases manacost, the most eagerly neglected factor of haste. I think BobTurkey once added this factor into his calculations and it dragged down the value of Haste completely.
 - It relies on additional spellcasting which is subject to many other factors like lag, fps, fight mechanics and player skill. Of course, we could just diss players who don&#039;t use it properly, but even the elite players may find it hard measure that aspect of themselves.
 - The benefit of the glyph of Shadow is often neglected or undervalued.

Never the less, maths comprising most factors will probably yield an optimal balance between crit and haste for various gear levels. That behavior is unescapable. 
I&#039;ll make a wild guess that those 2 ratio&#039;s are less than 10% apart from eachother. If so, it is likely that a player will end up gearing for more haste since there is so much crit available from other sources like talents, enchants, intellect and raid buffs. The haste acquired from raidbuffs will impact less factors, because of its multiplicative nature (though the diminishing return from haste and the reduced effectiveness on MB should still be in effect).

So, considering those factors, I have reason to doubt one stat can be canonized as superior. If maths and theories exist that go deeper than my own and manage to prove me wrong, then I would be very interested in them!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would be quite interested if you could give me a reference on the math indicating the benefit of haste over crit. I do a bit theorycrafting myself and I would love to see the works on it.</p>
<p>AFAIK SW:P does not benefit from Haste though the other DoT&#8217;s do. Crit, however, has a 100% damage bonus to all spells that shadow uses. Now.. Haste is a strong throughput stat in mathematical terms because:<br />
 &#8211; 1% Haste = 1% throughput, mathematically speaking<br />
 &#8211; Haste requires less rating than crit.</p>
<p>However, such maths often neglect other factors:<br />
 &#8211; Mind Blast has a cooldown and thus there is a reduced benefit of haste for that spell.<br />
 &#8211; Haste increases manacost, the most eagerly neglected factor of haste. I think BobTurkey once added this factor into his calculations and it dragged down the value of Haste completely.<br />
 &#8211; It relies on additional spellcasting which is subject to many other factors like lag, fps, fight mechanics and player skill. Of course, we could just diss players who don&#8217;t use it properly, but even the elite players may find it hard measure that aspect of themselves.<br />
 &#8211; The benefit of the glyph of Shadow is often neglected or undervalued.</p>
<p>Never the less, maths comprising most factors will probably yield an optimal balance between crit and haste for various gear levels. That behavior is unescapable.<br />
I&#8217;ll make a wild guess that those 2 ratio&#8217;s are less than 10% apart from eachother. If so, it is likely that a player will end up gearing for more haste since there is so much crit available from other sources like talents, enchants, intellect and raid buffs. The haste acquired from raidbuffs will impact less factors, because of its multiplicative nature (though the diminishing return from haste and the reduced effectiveness on MB should still be in effect).</p>
<p>So, considering those factors, I have reason to doubt one stat can be canonized as superior. If maths and theories exist that go deeper than my own and manage to prove me wrong, then I would be very interested in them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Power Word: Fail &#8211; The Priest Roundtable Event by Derevka</title>
		<link>http://www.raidwarning.net/2010/03/power-word-fail-the-priest-roundtable-event/comment-page-1/#comment-533</link>
		<dc:creator>Derevka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 03:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raidwarning.net/?p=3589#comment-533</guid>
		<description>Had a great time. Thanks for having me, gents.

Everyone remember to do a itunes review of Raidwarning on itunes!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Had a great time. Thanks for having me, gents.</p>
<p>Everyone remember to do a itunes review of Raidwarning on itunes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Power Word: Fail &#8211; The Priest Roundtable Event by Seven</title>
		<link>http://www.raidwarning.net/2010/03/power-word-fail-the-priest-roundtable-event/comment-page-1/#comment-532</link>
		<dc:creator>Seven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 00:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raidwarning.net/?p=3589#comment-532</guid>
		<description>Its a bootleg remix done by The Bloody Beetroots called &quot;Goose - Black Gloves&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its a bootleg remix done by The Bloody Beetroots called &#8220;Goose &#8211; Black Gloves&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Power Word: Fail &#8211; The Priest Roundtable Event by Thomasjs</title>
		<link>http://www.raidwarning.net/2010/03/power-word-fail-the-priest-roundtable-event/comment-page-1/#comment-531</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomasjs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 23:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raidwarning.net/?p=3589#comment-531</guid>
		<description>Anyone know what the name of the intro song is?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone know what the name of the intro song is?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Power Word: Fail &#8211; The Priest Roundtable Event by Matticus</title>
		<link>http://www.raidwarning.net/2010/03/power-word-fail-the-priest-roundtable-event/comment-page-1/#comment-530</link>
		<dc:creator>Matticus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 23:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raidwarning.net/?p=3589#comment-530</guid>
		<description>It was a lot of fun ont he show, and I&#039;d love to take part in it again. Should make it a regular feature. 

I&#039;d really love to do a healcast or something, once a month, but ugh, I wish I had the resources and the knowledge to do so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a lot of fun ont he show, and I&#8217;d love to take part in it again. Should make it a regular feature. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d really love to do a healcast or something, once a month, but ugh, I wish I had the resources and the knowledge to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Power Word: Fail &#8211; The Priest Roundtable Event by Power Word: Fail, Give It a Listen! &#124; Divine Aegis</title>
		<link>http://www.raidwarning.net/2010/03/power-word-fail-the-priest-roundtable-event/comment-page-1/#comment-529</link>
		<dc:creator>Power Word: Fail, Give It a Listen! &#124; Divine Aegis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 20:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raidwarning.net/?p=3589#comment-529</guid>
		<description>[...] podcast I announced I was going to be on last month is now available to download and you should GO LISTEN TO IT NOW! Because it&#8217;s awesome. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] podcast I announced I was going to be on last month is now available to download and you should GO LISTEN TO IT NOW! Because it&#8217;s awesome. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Power Word: Fail &#8211; The Priest Roundtable Event by David</title>
		<link>http://www.raidwarning.net/2010/03/power-word-fail-the-priest-roundtable-event/comment-page-1/#comment-528</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 18:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raidwarning.net/?p=3589#comment-528</guid>
		<description>I thought all the segments were very cool.  I think the shadow section just had more weighted questions towards cataclysm is all whereas the disc and holy had more on raiding and dreamwalker fights so you didnt get to hear about the spriests skills as much.  Playing a shadow priest myself I do understand that haste is greater than crit but fox had a good point that with a bad comp haste might not scale as well.  Also well it might be beating a dead horse I agree with xeno that if you are going to take away a (unique snowflake) aspect than shadow priests will continue to have a right to gripe until they are scaled better on the damage meters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought all the segments were very cool.  I think the shadow section just had more weighted questions towards cataclysm is all whereas the disc and holy had more on raiding and dreamwalker fights so you didnt get to hear about the spriests skills as much.  Playing a shadow priest myself I do understand that haste is greater than crit but fox had a good point that with a bad comp haste might not scale as well.  Also well it might be beating a dead horse I agree with xeno that if you are going to take away a (unique snowflake) aspect than shadow priests will continue to have a right to gripe until they are scaled better on the damage meters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Power Word: Fail &#8211; The Priest Roundtable Event by Sokario</title>
		<link>http://www.raidwarning.net/2010/03/power-word-fail-the-priest-roundtable-event/comment-page-1/#comment-527</link>
		<dc:creator>Sokario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 15:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raidwarning.net/?p=3589#comment-527</guid>
		<description>Holy section was good! As a shadow priest was a little disappointed with that section. Answers such as crit vs. haste were, quite frankly, incorrect and misleading (point for point haste wins by a substantial margin except in very rare situations, like double Reign of the Dead, and even then haste still wins by a bit); beating the dead horse of having Unique Snowflake Utility for shadow priests is simply tired.  I don&#039;t know the backgrounds of the speakers on the shadow segment, but I felt it could have used a voice of greater experience like Aliena in the holy section.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holy section was good! As a shadow priest was a little disappointed with that section. Answers such as crit vs. haste were, quite frankly, incorrect and misleading (point for point haste wins by a substantial margin except in very rare situations, like double Reign of the Dead, and even then haste still wins by a bit); beating the dead horse of having Unique Snowflake Utility for shadow priests is simply tired.  I don&#8217;t know the backgrounds of the speakers on the shadow segment, but I felt it could have used a voice of greater experience like Aliena in the holy section.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Power Word: Fail &#8211; The Priest Roundtable by Holy Raid Healing Batman! &#124; Tales of a Priest</title>
		<link>http://www.raidwarning.net/priests/comment-page-1/#comment-513</link>
		<dc:creator>Holy Raid Healing Batman! &#124; Tales of a Priest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raidwarning.net/?page_id=3368#comment-513</guid>
		<description>[...] forget to tune in for Power Word: Fail podcast! Hosted by RaidWarning! Send in your questions to raidwarningpodcast@gmail.com       $url = [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] forget to tune in for Power Word: Fail podcast! Hosted by RaidWarning! Send in your questions to <a href="mailto:raidwarningpodcast@gmail.com">raidwarningpodcast@gmail.com</a>       $url = [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Raid Warning Episode #33 &#8211; Beware the Old Chub by Intravax</title>
		<link>http://www.raidwarning.net/2010/02/raid-warning-episode-33-beware-the-old-chub/comment-page-1/#comment-512</link>
		<dc:creator>Intravax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 20:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raidwarning.net/?p=3506#comment-512</guid>
		<description>Honor farming idiots are nerd-gasming over the honor buffs to PvP.  Why blizz, WHYYYYYYYYYY!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honor farming idiots are nerd-gasming over the honor buffs to PvP.  Why blizz, WHYYYYYYYYYY!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Raid Warning Episode #33 &#8211; Beware the Old Chub by Zusterke</title>
		<link>http://www.raidwarning.net/2010/02/raid-warning-episode-33-beware-the-old-chub/comment-page-1/#comment-511</link>
		<dc:creator>Zusterke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 18:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raidwarning.net/?p=3506#comment-511</guid>
		<description>Great show guys. I really enjoyed the show and Thespius&#039; cover on the French Prince of Bel Air. It made me wonder: can we send in song requests that he should sing at the start of each show?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great show guys. I really enjoyed the show and Thespius&#8217; cover on the French Prince of Bel Air. It made me wonder: can we send in song requests that he should sing at the start of each show?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Power Word: Fail &#8211; The Priest Roundtable by Hymn of Hope: Our Misunderstood Little Friend &#124; Tales of a Priest</title>
		<link>http://www.raidwarning.net/priests/comment-page-1/#comment-510</link>
		<dc:creator>Hymn of Hope: Our Misunderstood Little Friend &#124; Tales of a Priest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 12:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raidwarning.net/?page_id=3368#comment-510</guid>
		<description>[...] to sign up and send in your questions for Power Word: Fail over at Raid Warning!       $url = &quot;http://talesofapriest.com/?p=227&quot;  This entry was posted on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to sign up and send in your questions for Power Word: Fail over at Raid Warning!       $url = &quot;http://talesofapriest.com/?p=227&quot;  This entry was posted on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Power Word: Fail &#8211; The Priest Roundtable by Lich King Defeated! Bring on Hard Modes! &#124; Tales of a Priest</title>
		<link>http://www.raidwarning.net/priests/comment-page-1/#comment-504</link>
		<dc:creator>Lich King Defeated! Bring on Hard Modes! &#124; Tales of a Priest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 23:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raidwarning.net/?page_id=3368#comment-504</guid>
		<description>[...] to sign up and send in your questions for Power Word: Fail over at Raid Warning!       $url = &quot;http://talesofapriest.com/?p=389&quot;  This entry was posted on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to sign up and send in your questions for Power Word: Fail over at Raid Warning!       $url = &quot;http://talesofapriest.com/?p=389&quot;  This entry was posted on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Power Word: Fail &#8211; The Priest Roundtable by Healing Sindragosa &#38; Video &#124; Tales of a Priest</title>
		<link>http://www.raidwarning.net/priests/comment-page-1/#comment-501</link>
		<dc:creator>Healing Sindragosa &#38; Video &#124; Tales of a Priest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 21:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raidwarning.net/?page_id=3368#comment-501</guid>
		<description>[...] forget to tune in for Power Word: Fail podcast! Hosted by RaidWarning! Send in your questions to raidwarningpodcast@gmail.com       $url = [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] forget to tune in for Power Word: Fail podcast! Hosted by RaidWarning! Send in your questions to <a href="mailto:raidwarningpodcast@gmail.com">raidwarningpodcast@gmail.com</a>       $url = [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Power Word: Fail &#8211; The Priest Roundtable by Raid Warning &#8211; A World of Warcraft Podcast</title>
		<link>http://www.raidwarning.net/priests/comment-page-1/#comment-493</link>
		<dc:creator>Raid Warning &#8211; A World of Warcraft Podcast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 22:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raidwarning.net/?page_id=3368#comment-493</guid>
		<description>[...] Priest Round Table: &#8220;Power Word: Fail&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Priest Round Table: &#8220;Power Word: Fail&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wild Shots: The Hunter Roundtable Event by Intravax</title>
		<link>http://www.raidwarning.net/2010/02/wild-shots-the-hunter-roundtable-event/comment-page-1/#comment-488</link>
		<dc:creator>Intravax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 23:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raidwarning.net/?p=2495#comment-488</guid>
		<description>Not counting the fact that Blizz doesn&#039;t want to make loot for specifically one class, if they did have guns that all classes would be able to use, they could do a main hand offhand like casters have.  Then, for hunters they could do the talent tree similar to Frost DK dual wield where they can dual wield the one hand weapons via placing points in the reconfigured talent tree.  Since they are redoing the talent trees anyways it could be a workaround.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not counting the fact that Blizz doesn&#8217;t want to make loot for specifically one class, if they did have guns that all classes would be able to use, they could do a main hand offhand like casters have.  Then, for hunters they could do the talent tree similar to Frost DK dual wield where they can dual wield the one hand weapons via placing points in the reconfigured talent tree.  Since they are redoing the talent trees anyways it could be a workaround.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Power Word: Fail &#8211; The Priest Roundtable by Big News- Power Word: Fail! &#124; Tales of a Priest</title>
		<link>http://www.raidwarning.net/priests/comment-page-1/#comment-484</link>
		<dc:creator>Big News- Power Word: Fail! &#124; Tales of a Priest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 04:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raidwarning.net/?page_id=3368#comment-484</guid>
		<description>[...] listeners and readers. So&#8230; send in your questions to raidwarningpodcast@gmail.com and visit www.raidwarning.net/priests for more [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] listeners and readers. So&#8230; send in your questions to <a href="mailto:raidwarningpodcast@gmail.com">raidwarningpodcast@gmail.com</a> and visit <a href="http://www.raidwarning.net/priests" rel="nofollow">http://www.raidwarning.net/priests</a> for more [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Plantronics Audio 995 Wireless Headset Review by Justin T</title>
		<link>http://www.raidwarning.net/2009/06/plantronics-audio-995-wireless-headset-review/comment-page-1/#comment-480</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 22:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raidwarning.net/?p=180#comment-480</guid>
		<description>hi, I am kerious if someone would be willing to either record an mp3 file of sorts so I can get a good quality sample of the microphone, or you can feel free to add drummer0608 to your skype and skype me to chat for a second, if not could you please consider uploading some where or either emailing a small audio sample of the microphone to drummer060891@gmail.com, I would greatly appreciate this from someone, I would like to here some voice, and then with the microphone positioned properly on your head, if you could like clap your hands or make some sort of noise sort of far away just for another small test in the same file, thanks for who ever does this for me</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi, I am kerious if someone would be willing to either record an mp3 file of sorts so I can get a good quality sample of the microphone, or you can feel free to add drummer0608 to your skype and skype me to chat for a second, if not could you please consider uploading some where or either emailing a small audio sample of the microphone to <a href="mailto:drummer060891@gmail.com">drummer060891@gmail.com</a>, I would greatly appreciate this from someone, I would like to here some voice, and then with the microphone positioned properly on your head, if you could like clap your hands or make some sort of noise sort of far away just for another small test in the same file, thanks for who ever does this for me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Raid Warning Episode #20 by Seven</title>
		<link>http://www.raidwarning.net/2009/10/raid-warning-episode-20/comment-page-1/#comment-474</link>
		<dc:creator>Seven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 20:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raidwarning.net/?p=1479#comment-474</guid>
		<description>Leech and crew are awesome! Glad you liked the show. I may have thrown off Sandeep a little with the questions</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leech and crew are awesome! Glad you liked the show. I may have thrown off Sandeep a little with the questions</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Raid Warning Episode #20 by Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.raidwarning.net/2009/10/raid-warning-episode-20/comment-page-1/#comment-472</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 03:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raidwarning.net/?p=1479#comment-472</guid>
		<description>Wow, Seven is totally the bottom... :-) (found out about you through ThisIsOutcasted)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, Seven is totally the bottom&#8230; <img src='http://raidwarning.net/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  (found out about you through ThisIsOutcasted)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wild Shots: The Hunter Roundtable Event by Hunter Round Table at Raid Warning! &#171; OutDPS!</title>
		<link>http://www.raidwarning.net/2010/02/wild-shots-the-hunter-roundtable-event/comment-page-1/#comment-454</link>
		<dc:creator>Hunter Round Table at Raid Warning! &#171; OutDPS!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 13:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raidwarning.net/?p=2495#comment-454</guid>
		<description>[...] 2, 2010   Thanks to the excellent hosts of Raid Warning for inviting me to participate on their hunter round table! My segment was debating a variety of things with the illustrious Brigwyn, and there are other [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2, 2010   Thanks to the excellent hosts of Raid Warning for inviting me to participate on their hunter round table! My segment was debating a variety of things with the illustrious Brigwyn, and there are other [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Raid Warning Episode #30 &#8211; Evil Anteaters by Seven</title>
		<link>http://www.raidwarning.net/2010/01/raid-warning-episode-30-evil-anteaters/comment-page-1/#comment-434</link>
		<dc:creator>Seven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 05:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raidwarning.net/?p=2311#comment-434</guid>
		<description>the one you&#039;re looking for is Episode 22

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.raidwarning.net/2009/11/raid-warning-episode-22/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.raidwarning.net/2009/11/raid-warning-episode-22/&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the one you&#8217;re looking for is Episode 22</p>
<p><a href="http://www.raidwarning.net/2009/11/raid-warning-episode-22/" rel="nofollow">http://www.raidwarning.net/2009/11/raid-warning-episode-22/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Raid Warning Episode #30 &#8211; Evil Anteaters by Nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.raidwarning.net/2010/01/raid-warning-episode-30-evil-anteaters/comment-page-1/#comment-433</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 03:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raidwarning.net/?p=2311#comment-433</guid>
		<description>which episode is the admiral ackbar one?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>which episode is the admiral ackbar one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Raid Warning Episode #31 &#8211; Mr Yuck Mouth Wins by Seven</title>
		<link>http://www.raidwarning.net/2010/01/raid-warning-episode-31-mr-yuck-mouth-wins/comment-page-1/#comment-432</link>
		<dc:creator>Seven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 20:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raidwarning.net/?p=2415#comment-432</guid>
		<description>it should work either way

raidwarningpodcast@gmail.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it should work either way</p>
<p><a href="mailto:raidwarningpodcast@gmail.com">raidwarningpodcast@gmail.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Raid Warning Episode #31 &#8211; Mr Yuck Mouth Wins by Glass</title>
		<link>http://www.raidwarning.net/2010/01/raid-warning-episode-31-mr-yuck-mouth-wins/comment-page-1/#comment-429</link>
		<dc:creator>Glass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 08:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raidwarning.net/?p=2415#comment-429</guid>
		<description>Ok stupid question time. Is your email address in caps, oh where you just drunk when you did that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok stupid question time. Is your email address in caps, oh where you just drunk when you did that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Raid Warning Episode #30 &#8211; Evil Anteaters by Seven</title>
		<link>http://www.raidwarning.net/2010/01/raid-warning-episode-30-evil-anteaters/comment-page-1/#comment-396</link>
		<dc:creator>Seven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 23:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raidwarning.net/?p=2311#comment-396</guid>
		<description>The anteater thing came from a converstation I had earlier that day... yeah... I guess I&#039;m weird.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The anteater thing came from a converstation I had earlier that day&#8230; yeah&#8230; I guess I&#8217;m weird.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Raid Warning Episode #30 &#8211; Evil Anteaters by Jemre</title>
		<link>http://www.raidwarning.net/2010/01/raid-warning-episode-30-evil-anteaters/comment-page-1/#comment-395</link>
		<dc:creator>Jemre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raidwarning.net/?p=2311#comment-395</guid>
		<description>Just listened to it. WTF where did the anteater thing come from? nearly spilled my beer laughing. you lightened up my PuG raid night immensely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just listened to it. WTF where did the anteater thing come from? nearly spilled my beer laughing. you lightened up my PuG raid night immensely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What Ever Happened to GM Events? by DJCJ</title>
		<link>http://www.raidwarning.net/2009/11/what-ever-happened-to-gm-events/comment-page-1/#comment-384</link>
		<dc:creator>DJCJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 19:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raidwarning.net/?p=1779#comment-384</guid>
		<description>Seven,
That is a really cool idea. I think it would bring some interest back to the game. I hope, &quot;..Blizzard is actually listening.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seven,<br />
That is a really cool idea. I think it would bring some interest back to the game. I hope, &#8220;..Blizzard is actually listening.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Raid Warning Episode #26 Holy Meerkats by buffd.net</title>
		<link>http://www.raidwarning.net/2009/12/raid-warning-episode-26-holy-meerkats/comment-page-1/#comment-382</link>
		<dc:creator>buffd.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 09:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raidwarning.net/?p=1974#comment-382</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Raid Warning – A World of Warcraft Podcast : Raid Warning...&lt;/strong&gt;

Meerkat Jesus Ninjas!!!!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Raid Warning – A World of Warcraft Podcast : Raid Warning&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Meerkat Jesus Ninjas!!!!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Raid Warning Episode #25 with Outlandish by Raid Warning – A World of Warcraft Podcast : Raid Warning &#124; World of Warcraft</title>
		<link>http://www.raidwarning.net/2009/11/raid-warning-episode-25-with-outlandish/comment-page-1/#comment-378</link>
		<dc:creator>Raid Warning – A World of Warcraft Podcast : Raid Warning &#124; World of Warcraft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 19:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raidwarning.net/?p=1903#comment-378</guid>
		<description>[...] The full story can be read/found upon Raid Warning – A World of Warcraft Podcast : Raid Warning [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The full story can be read/found upon Raid Warning – A World of Warcraft Podcast : Raid Warning [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Raid Warning Episode #25 with Outlandish by Raid Warning – A World of Warcraft Podcast : Raid Warning &#124; World of Warcraft Private Servers (WoWps)</title>
		<link>http://www.raidwarning.net/2009/11/raid-warning-episode-25-with-outlandish/comment-page-1/#comment-374</link>
		<dc:creator>Raid Warning – A World of Warcraft Podcast : Raid Warning &#124; World of Warcraft Private Servers (WoWps)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 04:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raidwarning.net/?p=1903#comment-374</guid>
		<description>[...] Matt from The Outlandish Podcast (www.outlandishpodcast.com) joins us this week to talk about the latest news in World of Warcraft .    Read more: Raid Warning – A World of Warcraft Podcast : Raid Warning [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Matt from The Outlandish Podcast (www.outlandishpodcast.com) joins us this week to talk about the latest news in World of Warcraft .    Read more: Raid Warning – A World of Warcraft Podcast : Raid Warning [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Raid Warning Episode #25 with Outlandish by buffd.net</title>
		<link>http://www.raidwarning.net/2009/11/raid-warning-episode-25-with-outlandish/comment-page-1/#comment-373</link>
		<dc:creator>buffd.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 00:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raidwarning.net/?p=1903#comment-373</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Raid Warning Episode 25 - With Outlandish...&lt;/strong&gt;

Matt from The Outlandish Podcast (www.outlandishpodcast.com) joins us this week to talk about the latest news in World of Warcraft. He also manages to make it through two of Seven’s horrible pop quizzes....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Raid Warning Episode 25 &#8211; With Outlandish&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Matt from The Outlandish Podcast (www.outlandishpodcast.com) joins us this week to talk about the latest news in World of Warcraft. He also manages to make it through two of Seven’s horrible pop quizzes&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RW Guest Blog:  Casual vs Hardcore: Is it really a big deal? by Zulwiga</title>
		<link>http://www.raidwarning.net/2009/11/rw-guest-blog-casual-vs-hardcore-is-it-really-a-big-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-371</link>
		<dc:creator>Zulwiga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raidwarning.net/?p=1736#comment-371</guid>
		<description>I agree that heroic content is too easy now.  Partially because gear is more easily attainable.  You can&#039;t increase the base difficulty of existing dungeons without making them impossible for their intended audience, the fresh 80.  Until they do something like tune the dungeon based on what badge you want, heroics will continue to be a snoozefest.  The death of crowd control and trash has taken a lot of the strategy out of heroics.  It&#039;s way too easy just to tank n spank every boss.

I think you hit on something you didn&#039;t intend to.  That mix of t8 and greens shows that you can&#039;t be decked out in all your gear just by doing heroics, you have to raid to fill in certain slots.  There&#039;s also a math problem with saying a player can just farm heroics every day and easily be in the best gear.

Assuming just the (realistically) PUGgable Triumph Emblems you can get
2 Daily Heroic = 14 emblems + 4 in VoA 10/25 + 3 in Onyxia 10 = 21 Triumph Emblems a week.  Assuming you don&#039;t get saved to a bad group.

A single piece of Triumph Tier gear is 75 Emblems. That&#039;s 3 weeks of work.  That&#039;s a long time for one piece of gear, and if someone has the time to do the daily every day, 2 VoAs, and an Onyxia PUG every week, why aren&#039;t they raiding?  It&#039;s the same time investment and much more enjoyable to raid with a guild.

It is much easier to get the Conquest Emblems, but old gear is old.  The hardcore raiders have already cleared Ulduar, and they&#039;ve moved on to the shinier gear.  Not to mention the new status symbols, fast mounts and titles.

Where do new raiders come from if the only thing available is heroic blues and purples?  Is it fun to have to run people through every old raid to get gear in order for them to be able to fill in a current raid spot?  Without the badge system we&#039;d be right back to the 40 man dungeon days.  The only people who could raid would be people who already raid because it&#039;s impossible to catch up if you didn&#039;t start at the beginning.  That doesn&#039;t make for a fun game once you hit max.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that heroic content is too easy now.  Partially because gear is more easily attainable.  You can&#8217;t increase the base difficulty of existing dungeons without making them impossible for their intended audience, the fresh 80.  Until they do something like tune the dungeon based on what badge you want, heroics will continue to be a snoozefest.  The death of crowd control and trash has taken a lot of the strategy out of heroics.  It&#8217;s way too easy just to tank n spank every boss.</p>
<p>I think you hit on something you didn&#8217;t intend to.  That mix of t8 and greens shows that you can&#8217;t be decked out in all your gear just by doing heroics, you have to raid to fill in certain slots.  There&#8217;s also a math problem with saying a player can just farm heroics every day and easily be in the best gear.</p>
<p>Assuming just the (realistically) PUGgable Triumph Emblems you can get<br />
2 Daily Heroic = 14 emblems + 4 in VoA 10/25 + 3 in Onyxia 10 = 21 Triumph Emblems a week.  Assuming you don&#8217;t get saved to a bad group.</p>
<p>A single piece of Triumph Tier gear is 75 Emblems. That&#8217;s 3 weeks of work.  That&#8217;s a long time for one piece of gear, and if someone has the time to do the daily every day, 2 VoAs, and an Onyxia PUG every week, why aren&#8217;t they raiding?  It&#8217;s the same time investment and much more enjoyable to raid with a guild.</p>
<p>It is much easier to get the Conquest Emblems, but old gear is old.  The hardcore raiders have already cleared Ulduar, and they&#8217;ve moved on to the shinier gear.  Not to mention the new status symbols, fast mounts and titles.</p>
<p>Where do new raiders come from if the only thing available is heroic blues and purples?  Is it fun to have to run people through every old raid to get gear in order for them to be able to fill in a current raid spot?  Without the badge system we&#8217;d be right back to the 40 man dungeon days.  The only people who could raid would be people who already raid because it&#8217;s impossible to catch up if you didn&#8217;t start at the beginning.  That doesn&#8217;t make for a fun game once you hit max.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Raid Warning Episode #19 by Blues Posts and a very cool new charity a company is doing through Blizzard &#171; Not Just Another WoW Girl</title>
		<link>http://www.raidwarning.net/2009/10/raid-warning-episode-19/comment-page-1/#comment-370</link>
		<dc:creator>Blues Posts and a very cool new charity a company is doing through Blizzard &#171; Not Just Another WoW Girl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 17:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raidwarning.net/?p=1398#comment-370</guid>
		<description>[...] Raid Warning Podcast: Steel Series World of Warcraft Gaming Mouse [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Raid Warning Podcast: Steel Series World of Warcraft Gaming Mouse [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What Ever Happened to GM Events? by Spazmoosifer</title>
		<link>http://www.raidwarning.net/2009/11/what-ever-happened-to-gm-events/comment-page-1/#comment-368</link>
		<dc:creator>Spazmoosifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raidwarning.net/?p=1779#comment-368</guid>
		<description>I would love to see this kind of thing happen.  It would be even more interesting if it would be a case where multiple GMs could organize to carry out an event.  Perhaps Sylvanas wants to have a chat w/ Varian, or a couple of &quot;commoners&quot; want to chat with Thrall.

It would make the game more interesting to play all around, because it would add a more dynamic aspect to the game, as opposed to the same thing over and over again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to see this kind of thing happen.  It would be even more interesting if it would be a case where multiple GMs could organize to carry out an event.  Perhaps Sylvanas wants to have a chat w/ Varian, or a couple of &#8220;commoners&#8221; want to chat with Thrall.</p>
<p>It would make the game more interesting to play all around, because it would add a more dynamic aspect to the game, as opposed to the same thing over and over again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
